Our Blog
November 15, 2024

Prediction Markets Meet Public Goods: A New Approach to RetroPGF

Gitcoin and Filecoin introduce prediction markets to public goods funding, enabling community members to bet on project outcomes and help badgeholders identify high-impact initiatives. Discover how this futarchy experiment could transform decentralized funding decisions.

As we continue to innovate decentralized funding mechanisms, Gitcoin and Filecoin are excited to introduce an experiment that blends community wisdom with predictive insights: futarchy for public goods funding. For Filecoin’s second Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RetroPGF) round, we are launching a prediction market alongside badgeholder voting, allowing stakeholders to weigh in on the potential success of projects. This futarchy-inspired approach invites a broader community to share insights and potentially amplify the impact of community-driven funding.

What is Futarchy in Public Goods Funding?

At its core, futarchy uses prediction markets as an indicator of what the community believes will drive success. Here, we’re applying this to the funding process. Rather than relying solely on badgeholders to decide which projects receive funding, we’ve set up markets where anyone familiar with Filecoin’s ecosystem can "bet" on project outcomes. These bets reflect what traders believe about the project’s long-term success or community impact. The idea is that collective predictions can give a clear, data-backed perspective on the merit of each project, helping badgeholders make better-informed funding decisions.

The Goal: Help Badgeholders Discover the Gems—and avoid funding low-impact projects

Our primary objective is to enhance badgeholders’ ability to spot high-value projects without the need to scrutinize every proposal. With hundreds of submissions, distinguishing which projects are genuine "gems" and which might be low impact can be daunting. The futarchy experiment intends to streamline this by focusing on proposals that fall at the extremes: the top 10% (the “gems”) and the bottom 10% (the “not-so-good”). Badgeholders can use these predictions as a signal for which projects may be worth a closer look—or a second thought.

How the Experiment Works

For this RetroPGF round, we are setting up markets only for a subset of the proposals to test the waters. By concentrating on extremes, the futarchy experiment avoids the need for individual markets for every proposal, keeping cognitive load manageable for traders.

Here’s a breakdown of the process:

  1. Two Market Categories: The first market focuses on identifying hidden “gems” (top 10% by funding). The second highlights potential “trash” (bottom 10% by funding). This selective approach makes it easy for traders to contribute their knowledge where it matters most.
  2. Market Insights for Badgeholders: As voting progresses, badgeholders will see market predictions for proposals, noting whether the market classifies them as potential “gems,” “trash,” or neutral. If a project’s market prediction differs significantly from badgeholders' initial assessments, they can choose to investigate further.

How to participate in these markets

  1. Visit either market:
  2. Create a Manifold account if you don't have one (sign up is free and takes less than a minute)
  3. Each market shows a list of projects with their current probability estimates:some text
    • The percentage shown (e.g., 50%) represents the market's current estimate of that project being in the top/bottom 10%
    • Click "Yes" if you think the actual probability is higher than shown
    • Click "No" if you think the actual probability is lower than shown
    • Click on link in the project name to view its full proposal on fil-retropgf.io
  4. New traders receive free betting credits (called "mana") to start tradingsome text
    • The more confident you are about the probability difference, the more mana you can bet
    • Your potential returns are shown before confirming each trade
    • You can trade on multiple projects within each market

The markets will close once RetroPGF voting ends, and winning predictions will be paid out based on the final funding results.

Why the Top and Bottom 10%?

Focusing on the extremes provides a streamlined and impactful approach. Projects in the top 10% are often game-changers, while those in the bottom 10% may not deliver expected value. Concentrating on these ranges helps us avoid diluting trader focus and reduces the need for unnecessary market complexity.

Who are the Traders, and Why Do They Participate?

Traders are community members who have insights into Filecoin’s ecosystem or are familiar with the projects in question. Examples include project teams, and other knowledgeable Filecoin stakeholders. By trading on what they perceive as mispriced markets, traders provide valuable signals and have the opportunity to profit, making markets more accurate as they correct mispricings.

Addressing Concerns: Manipulation and Trader Bias

A core principle in prediction markets is liquidity. When markets have sufficient liquidity, attempts at manipulation become costly for the manipulator and advantageous for informed traders who can correct the mispricing. As the experiment unfolds, we’ll gauge the liquidity levels necessary to keep markets stable and insightful. As for trader biases, anonymity and diversified participation can help balance this issue by encouraging objective betting.

Goals of the Futarchy Experiment

Through this experiment, Gitcoin and Filecoin aim to:

  1. Gauge Community Willingness to Trade: We’re exploring the extent to which subsidized prediction markets attract participants, how much liquidity is needed, and what incentives work best.
  2. Assess Predictive Accuracy: By comparing predicted versus actual funding outcomes, we’ll understand how accurately market predictions reflect project quality.
  3. Improve Discovery of High-Impact Projects: We aim to enhance badgeholders’ ability to detect high-potential projects they might otherwise overlook, improving funding impact.
  4. Refine Prediction Market Mechanics for Future Rounds: By identifying friction points, such as liquidity and awareness challenges, we’ll continuously refine the prediction market approach for greater efficacy in future rounds.

Experiment Setup Highlights

  • Proposal Selection: For the pilot, we focus on new and less-known projects where prediction markets can add the most value.
  • Market Privacy: Voting results remain hidden from traders to prevent undue influence on prediction prices.
  • Result Sharing: We’ll present prediction market outcomes to badgeholders, especially where there’s a notable disagreement with their votes.

Future Potential and Lessons Learned

This initial experiment is the first step in a longer journey. We’re tracking metrics like trader turnout, badgeholder feedback on market predictions, and accuracy of predictions to guide improvements in future futarchy-enabled funding rounds. While challenges like low trader participation or badgeholder skepticism could impact early rounds, each iteration will inform our approach to building more robust, community-driven funding models.

By adding futarchy to the public goods funding toolkit, Gitcoin and Filecoin hope to empower community members with deeper insights into what makes a project successful, building a decentralized, data-backed way of amplifying impact in funding decisions. We’re excited to see how this innovative mechanism shapes the future of public goods funding.

Stay Tuned

We’ll be sharing updates as this experiment progresses. If you’re a badgeholder, community member, or simply curious about decentralized funding models, we welcome you to follow along and join the conversation!

Read more

Featured Posts

GitxChange: Rad Hacking with RadicalxChange

loading
loading