Gitcoin
Gitcoin Grants Garden GG23 Retrospective

Gitcoin Grants Garden GG23 Retrospective

The Gitcoin Grants Garden GG23 round transitioned from Quadratic Funding to Conviction Voting with $30k in matching, funding 21 communities across Ethereum OSS, pop-up cities, DeSci, climate, and political activism — demonstrating conviction voting's viability for sustainable public goods allocation.

2 min read · June 6, 2025

Overview

The Gitcoin Grants Garden GG23 Community Round transitioned from Quadratic Funding to Conviction Voting, supported by $30k in matching funds from Gitcoin, 1Hive, and Celo Public Goods. The initiative funded 21 communities across Ethereum open source software, pop-up cities, DeSci, climate initiatives, and political activism.

Key Financial Results

Total Funding: $60,659

  • Community contributions: $25,900
  • Gitcoin: $20,990
  • 1Hive: $10,744
  • Celo Public Goods: $3,000

Matching Distribution:

  • $18,000 matching funds distributed
  • 21 communities funded
  • 1.7x average matching multiplier
  • 104 unique participants

Allo Builders Track:

  • $12,700 distributed
  • 6 projects funded
  • 27 governance participants

Round Structure

Three governance tracks operated with distinct purposes:

  1. Community Matching: Projects created Gardens communities and funding pools targeting specific needs
  2. Allo.Capital Builder's Fund: Milestone-based support for capital allocation builders
  3. Signaling Pools: Non-financial governance for ecosystem alignment, pain point identification, and Council elections

Participation required joining the Gitcoin Grants Garden, signing the Community Covenant, and staking 1 $GTC.

Matching funding for communities diagram showing round structure

Round mechanism overview for Gitcoin Grants Garden GG23

Community Feedback Scores

  • Overall experience: 7.1/10
  • Application ease: 6.8/10
  • App interface intuitiveness: 6.3/10
  • Ecosystem growth achievement: 7.0/10

Key Challenges Identified

Technical: Subgraph latency, UI/UX friction, wallet connectivity issues

Process: Community onboarding complexity, unclear token eligibility criteria, registration deadline pressure

Feature Requests: Improved submission workflows, mobile optimization, enhanced analytics, DAO tool integrations, multilingual support

Future Initiatives

  • Incorporate UI/UX feedback into product roadmap
  • Develop performance-based matching beyond funding metrics
  • Expand ecosystem partnerships for GG24
  • Maintain off-season governance engagement
  • Advance Gardens tokenomics innovation

Conclusion

The round demonstrated conviction voting's viability as an alternative to traditional quadratic funding for sustainable, community-driven public goods allocation.


Source: Original post on Gitcoin Governance Forum

Tags

gitcoinconviction-votinggrantscommunity-governanceweb3

Related Apps

Related Mechanisms

Related Campaigns